In particular, I think much of what we have discusses in
class can be viewed through the lens of Japan. An another article from the Economist, “Win Some, Lose Some”, takes
a look at the monetary policy debate specifically Japan, an issue over which
the prime minister and the central bank are butting heads. Shinzo Abe, the new
prime minister, has declared to curb the independence of the Bank of Japan in
order to “strong-arm” the country out of its entrenched deflation and spiraling
debt. The move would sacrifice monetary autonomy, but potentially reflate the
Japanese economy.
Like we have discussed in class, there is a “trilemma” that
lies in the balance of fixed exchange rates, free capital flows and sovereign
monetary policy. A country can fix its exchange rate without weakening its
central bank, but only by maintaining control of capital flows. It can leave
capital flows free and retain monetary autonomy, but let exchange rates
fluctuate. Or it leave capital free and stabilize the currency through fixed
exchange rates, but only by relinquishing monetary autonomy. Referencing comments made by Krugman, the
article describes Japan’s situation as a “looking-glass realm in which virtue
is vice and prudence is folly”, that is, perhaps the government is onto
something by letting interest rates and inflation run their course.
However, as the article points out, the Bank of Japan is
refusing to relinquish its sovereignty without a fight, expressing misgivings
about its ability to meet the expectations of Abe’s regime change” in economic
policy. It set a 2% inflation target and agreed to open-ended asset purchases,
but time frame appears to be a vision on broad horizons rather than a tactical
plan. The Bank of Japan has also attempted to mediate another part of Abe’s
economic policy – fiscal stimulus. The article explains, “Monetary easing alone
does not boost GDP much if the private sector cannot be persuaded to borrow, so
the government provides the missing demand via stimulus”. The central bank’s
asset purchases are meant to ensure financing will be available for the
stimulus. Altogether, the Bank of Japan has not yet taken the reforms in
stride, weakening Abe’s leverage on monetary policy.
In addition, there is talk of deregulation and new trade
agreements. Another big idea floating on the table is using the bank to buy
government bonds. However, the most controversial ideas may have to wait on the
back burner until an upper-house election in July. But many feel that the
country cannot “afford to linger”. Altogether, this also brings into account
the importance of institutions in determining how governments make monetary policy
decisions. For an interesting article on
that front, check out “The Voice of Public Choice”. In a testament to the late
economist, James Buchanan, the article analyzes an era of fiscal deficit and
growing debt from misguided monetary policy in the United States.
Although it may be a good idea to try to inflate the economy by playing around with the "trillema," I don't think it's a good idea for Japan's central bank to relinquish its sovereignty. As we have discussed in class, the sovereignty of the central banks helps fight corruption by not letting its decision be influenced by political motivations. And even though the government may want control for the most pure motives, if they get this power there is no telling how they may be corrupted in the future.
ReplyDelete