International relations are often characterized by extreme politeness and strict adherence to social etiquette. Even competing powers who share little in common, such as China and the United States, find the time for political niceties. It was therefore even more surprising to read that Italy's then-Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, was caught referring to Angela Merkel, Germany's Prime Minister, as a "culona inchiavabile." While it is amusing to finally catch a glimpse of the personal thoughts of a head of state, the reactions sparked by Berlusconi's misstep were anything but funny. Many Italians were outraged at their Prime Minister's remarks, but rallied behind him after Italy was publicly ridiculed by several European Union countries, most notably France and Germany. Apparently, nothing unites a country like being on the receiving end of international ridicule.
The relationship that Italy and Germany share has always been close, but the creation of the European Union has added an additional dynamic. Northern Italy's strong Germanic influence is noticeable almost everywhere: some northern towns speak a dialect of Italian that borrows heavily from German (and is almost unrecognizable to southern Italians); public transportation management matches German methods, and not the notoriously inefficient South; and economic activity in the region is dominated by the production of machinery and other high-skill goods. The division between the two countries is first apparent after the creation of the European Union, where both countries lost domestic monetary autonomy. The loss of domestic monetary autonomy is important because Germany and Italy traditionally, and in recent times, have had almost opposite views on the correct way to manage a national economy. Generally, Germany has tended towards more conservative policy that focuses on maintaining low levels of inflation while Italy has tended towards more liberal policy that focuses on economic growth even in the face of a growing debt and deficit.
These contrasting opinions on economic management have led to friction between the two countries as the European Union struggles to haul itself out of the global recession. The European Union's power lies in the ability of its 27 member states to act collectively; however, if any of the members choose to free-ride, the collective action of the group will be less efficient and more prone to failure. Italy promised the EU to reduce its deficit, in part by crafting two austerity budgets, but at the same time the Italians refused to pass a stimulus package, as the rest of the EU had already done. Italian's semi-commitment to EU monetary policy, resulting from a combination of foolish politicians and nationalist sentiment, came to a brief end after the election of technocrat Mario Monti.
Monti, an economist by trade, was quick to understand the problem and to identify solutions. His most effective solution was putting into place emergency austerity measures which raised taxes and cut welfare. Italians quickly grew to hate the austerity measures and their champion, Mario Monti. In February of 2013, new elections were held in Italy after Mario Monti announced his forced retirement. Although there was no clear victor (new elections will soon be held), the 'disgraced' Berlusconi still managed to attract almost one third of the vote, an indication of how unpopular the austerity measures are with Italians.
Politics in Italy are chaotic at best. I don't believe that the Italian government or its citizens completely understood what it meant to join the Eurozone. "Off record" conversations will occasionally make an appearance in mainstream media; however I believe the comment made by Berlusconi is indicative of deeper problems in Italy. The government is still facing seriously financial troubles and they just ousted the economist in charge of the austerity measures. I predict the Italian economy and government will have to hit rock bottom before true reforms will take hold. Rock bottom might take the form of being kicked off the Euro or a severe economic depression. Whatever the case might be, the Italian government will not take the austerity measures seriously until something drastic occurs.
ReplyDeleteI also think Berlusconi's comments point to another problem in the realm of international politics which faces all women leaders. It is unthinkable that somebody would make derogatory sexual comments about a male world leader, yet somehow it is still acceptable to say this about women leaders. It seems Berlusconi's biggest mistake was getting caught. The discrimination against women in these top leadership roles is still very prevalent. Even in the U.S. we saw this discrimination against Hillary Clinton, and to a lesser degree Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman (although neither of them could be taken seriously anyway, male or female.) Yet the claim still stands, in today's discourse many people talk about the women's movement being completed, but events like this prove women worldwide still have a ways to go.
ReplyDeleteThe European Union has enough trouble acting as a collective body without tense relations between Merkel and Berlusconi. With 27 member-states, the EU has had a very difficult time agreeing on economic issues. This "deepening and widening" problem has been extremely present during the Euro crisis, with members less and less able to come to agreements especially on austerity practices. Because there are so many members, these heads of state must learn to work together in order to get anything done. Having Berlusconi in office isn't a good start.
ReplyDeleteAlso: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMX3EgnI6xg
It seems that a lot of the issues being seen in the EU could be due to a lack of European Solidarity. At what point have the governors of States in the US made similar comments about one another? Obviously this is too big a comparison to really make but with the original idea being a United States of Europe it seems like a decent argument. With that said, maybe they need to find a stronger platform for all EU member states to adopt a true "United Europe" mentality. I am not sure what could do this but, but it would have to be pretty big.
ReplyDeleteNot that this will have much to do with international political economy, but this is clearly a gendered issue. While there many not be many instances of male to male comments there are many instances in the US in which female politicians' appearance is commented on. There is evidence that pointing out a women's appearance when she is running no matter if it is good, bad, or neutral negatively affects her electability. Recently Obama just was recorded saying the California attorney general was "by far the best looking attorney general in the country." So, Berlusconi comment on Merkel's appearance is not the result of a lack of solidarity in Europe, but the result of an almost globally held notion that a woman's appearance is something that needs to be commented on and that it somehow affects how well she is able to govern.
Deletehttp://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/04/08/1833511/women-candidates-physical-appearance/
There was mention of social etiquette in international relations in the first post and I just wanted to point out that adherence to this social etiquette can only be explained by the fact that a country's reputation depends on how it interacts with other countries. There is no global government policing how country's interact with each other so it is only assumed that countries amicably interact with each other because they have something to gain from it or something to lose if they don't. That being said, Berlusconi's reputation is in tatters and seeing that there is not much to gain from good relations with Germany or any other country other than austerity measures means that he feels he can act in any way he wishes. Being that austerity measures are not a popular option with Italians it makes sense that they are more willing to back Berlusconi that Monti.
ReplyDelete